Kb. Wiberg et al., SUBSTITUENT EFFECTS .6. HETEROSUBSTITUTED ALLYL RADICALS - COMPARISONWITH SUBSTITUTED ALLYL CATIONS AND ANIONS, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 117(24), 1995, pp. 6535-6543
The energies, band orders, and spin polarizations of a series of CH2=C
H-XH(n)(.) radicals were calculated at the UMP2/6-311+G(*), Becke3LYP
/6-311+G(*), and QCISD/6-311G(**) theoretical levels, and the energie
s also were obtained at the G2(MP2) theoretical level. The energies of
the parent compounds were obtained in the same fashion and their bond
dissociation energies were derived from these data. The Becke3LYP and
the G2(MP2) energies predicted essentially the same stabilization ene
rgies for the radicals, and stabilization was found mainly with allyl
itself and with the vinyl thiol radical indicating that stabilization
requires that the terminal atoms have similar electronegativities. A s
tudy of related radicals also indicated that stabilization is lost whe
n the central atom has a different electronegativity. Therefore, stabi
lization of the allyl radical appears to require that all three atoms
in the allyl system have similar electronegativities. It is found that
the radical center prefers to be at the less electronegative atom. Wh
en the terminal atoms have similar electronegativities, the odd electr
on is shared between them, and the center atom becomes spin polarized
in the opposite sense. Spin polarizations calculated from Becke3LYP an
d QCISD wave functions are essentially the same, but those calculated
from MP2 wave functions are often incorrect as a result of spin contam
ination. The results obtained with the allyl radicals are compared wit
h corresponding data for allyl cations and anions.