Rd. Ford et al., DIAGNOSTIC ULTRASOUND FOR SUSPECTED APPENDICITIS - DOES THE ADDED COST PRODUCE A BETTER OUTCOME, The American surgeon, 60(11), 1994, pp. 895-898
Acute appendicitis is one of the most common abdominal surgical emerge
ncies in North America. Although the treatment of appendicitis has rem
ained the same for over 250 years, diagnostic techniques have changed
immensely. Most recently, graded compression ultrasonography has recei
ved much support. In an attempt to determine whether ultrasonography h
as improved the outcome in acute appendicitis, we retrospectively revi
ewed the records of all patients undergoing appendectomy and/or ultras
ound for suspected appendicitis during two separate 12-month periods.
We began using ultrasound in the diagnosis of appendicitis in 1987; th
erefore, 1986 was used as our pre-ultrasound year; 1989 was used as ou
r comparison year because ultrasound had become widely applied in the
diagnosis of acute appendicitis by this time. Data was tabulated on al
l patients undergoing appendectomy in both study years, as well as tho
se also undergoing ultrasonography in 1989. The populations in 1986 an
d 1989 were similar for all data tabulated. The diagnostic accuracy ra
te actually decreased after the implementation of ultrasonography (85.
6% vs 77.0%, P < 0.05). This trend was seen in both male and female pa
tients, reaching statistical significance in the male population (P <
0.05). The incidence of perforation and complications were not statist
ically decreased after the implementation of ultrasound. Ultrasound di
d not decrease the length of hospital stay, and in addition added appr
oximately $48,000 to the treatment cost of appendicitis in 1989. Thus,
despite adding cost, ultrasonography for appendicitis did not improve
our ability to diagnose or accurately treat appendicitis.