PHARMACOLOGY OF EPIDURAL FENTANYL, ALFENTANIL, AND SUFENTANIL IN VOLUNTEERS

Citation
Ba. Coda et al., PHARMACOLOGY OF EPIDURAL FENTANYL, ALFENTANIL, AND SUFENTANIL IN VOLUNTEERS, Anesthesiology, 81(5), 1994, pp. 1149-1161
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00033022
Volume
81
Issue
5
Year of publication
1994
Pages
1149 - 1161
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-3022(1994)81:5<1149:POEFAA>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Background: Despite a large number of clinical investigations in posto perative patients, the pharmacology of epidural fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil has not been well characterized in a human laboratory s etting. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study, we e valuated analgesia and side effects produced by epidural fentanyl (30 and 100 mu g), alfentanil (300 and 1,000 mu g), and sufentanil (3 and 10 mu g) in volunteers. Methods: Each of 12 volunteers participated in four separate study sessions. The pain model was cutaneous electrical stimulation of intensity sufficient to produce a pain report of 5 on a 0-5 scale, delivered alternately to the finger and toe. Ventilatory drive, pupil size, and subjective ratings of alertness, nausea, and pr uritus were measured using visual analog scales. On each study day, af ter baseline measurements, an epidural catheter was placed at the L2-L 3 or L3-L4 interspace. Subjects received the small dose of study drug, and the tests were repeated at 2, 55, and 35 min after drug administr ation. Subjects then received the large dose of the same study drug, a nd the series of tests was repeated at 2, 55, and 95 min later. Plasma opioid concentrations were measured using gas chromatography-mass spe ctrometry. Results: Dose-dependent analgesia was found for all study o pioids. For both doses of all opioids, toe analgesia was significantIy greater than finger analgesia. Epidural fentanyl and alfentanil provi ded greater analgesia than sufentanil at the doses investigated. Sedat ion, increased end-tidal carbon dioxide, and pupillary constriction oc curred only after the large epidural doses of all opioids. Overall, th e incidence of subjective side effects was low, but four subjects expe rienced pruritus after 100 mu g fentanyl, and four were nauseated afte r 1,000 mu g alfentanil. Plasma opioid concentrations were near minimu m effective analgesic plasma concentrations only after larger epidural doses. Conclusions: Lumbar epidural fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufenta nil produce selective lower-extremity analgesia. Low plasma opioid con centrations measured after small epidural opioid doses suggest a spina l mechanism for analgesia. Larger doses of epidural opioids result in systemic absorption and are likely to produce supraspinal analgesia an d other side effects.