AUTOLOGOUS BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTATION FOR PATIENTS WITH NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA AND CNS INVOLVEMENT - THOSE TRANSPLANTED WITH ACTIVE CNS DISEASE HAVE A POOR OUTCOME - A REPORT BY THE EUROPEAN BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANT LYMPHOMA REGISTRY
Cd. Williams et al., AUTOLOGOUS BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTATION FOR PATIENTS WITH NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA AND CNS INVOLVEMENT - THOSE TRANSPLANTED WITH ACTIVE CNS DISEASE HAVE A POOR OUTCOME - A REPORT BY THE EUROPEAN BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANT LYMPHOMA REGISTRY, Journal of clinical oncology, 12(11), 1994, pp. 2415-2422
Purpose: CNS involvement of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) has always be
en considered a poor prognostic factor in relation to survival with co
nventional therapy. However, its effect on the outcome of autologous b
one marrow transplantation (ABMT) has not been assessed. We examined t
his using data from the European Bone Marrow Transplant (EBMT) Lymphom
a Registry. Patients and Methods: One thousand four hundred sixty-four
patients with NHL have been reported to the EBMT registry, of whom 62
had CNS involvement. Patients were divided into those who were clear
of CNS disease at the time of ABMT and those who were not. Response, c
omplications, and outcome to ABMT were analyzed, as were details of CN
S diagnosis, treatment, and prophylaxis. Results: Status at transplant
was the only factor that significantly affected outcome of ABMT on un
ivariate analysis (P = .03). The progression-free survival (PFS) rate
of the group that had no CNS involvement at ABMT was 42% at 5 years, c
ompared with 27% in a group of stage IV NHL patients without CNS disea
se (matched for status at transplant and histology). There were four o
f 45 (8.9%) toxic deaths, The PFS rate of the group that had CNS invol
vement at ABMT was 9% at a median follow-up time of 71 months, which w
as significantly different (P = .001) from that of the other group. Th
ere were five of 17 (29.4%) toxic deaths (P = .043). patients who had
CNS involvement at diagnosis, as compared with relapse, and those trea
ted with both intrathecal chemotherapy and irradiation had a better ou
tcome. Conclusion: The presence of CNS disease before ABMT but not pre
sent at transplant does not adversely affect the outcome of ABMT. In c
ontrast, patients with CNS involvement at the time of ABMT have a poor
prognosis, although a small number survive in complete remission (CR)
.