The literature on stochastic voting to date has focused almost exclusi
vely on models with only two candidates (or parties). This paper studi
es multiparty competition with stochastic voting. We look at two diffe
rent models in which candidates aim to maximize their expected vote, a
s well as a model where the objective of candidates is rank minimizati
on. The equilibria of these models are derived and characterized. We s
how that the properties of the equilibria are quite different from tho
se derived in deterministic models. Furthermore, the analysis shows th
at deterministic voting models are not robust since the introduction o
f even a minute level of uncertainty leads to a drastic change in pred
ictions. Consequently, we argue that the deterministic model provides
a misleading benchmark. Stochastic models provide a much richer framew
ork, and the nature of the uncertainty in voter choice is a key determ
inant of the qualitative properties of the equilibria.