Vl. Morris et al., MAMMARY-CARCINOMA CELL-LINES OF HIGH AND LOW METASTATIC POTENTIAL DIFFER NOT IN EXTRAVASATION BUT IN SUBSEQUENT MIGRATION AND GROWTH, Clinical & experimental metastasis, 12(6), 1994, pp. 357-367
We examined the extravasation and subsequent migration and growth of m
urine mammary tumor cell lines (D2A1 and D2.OR) which differ in their
metastatic ability in lung and liver, invasiveness in vitro and expres
sion of the cysteine proteinase cathepsin L. In light of the differenc
es in invasiveness and cathepsin L expression, we hypothesized that du
ring hematogenous metastasis the two cell lines would differ primarily
in their ability to extravasate. We used in vivo videomicroscopy of m
ouse liver and chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane to examine the pr
ocess and timing of extravasation and subsequent steps in metastasis f
or these cell lines. In contrast to our expectations, no differences w
ere found between the cell lines in either the timing or mechanism of
extravasation, at least 95% of cells having extravasated by 3 days aft
er injection. However, after extravasation, the more metastatic and in
vasive D2A1 cells showed a greater ability to migrate to sites which f
avor tumor growth and to replicate to form micrometastases. These stud
ies point to post-extravasation events (migration and growth) as being
critical in metastasis formation,