Mw. Skinner et al., EVALUATION OF A NEW SPECTRAL PEAK CODING STRATEGY FOR THE NUCLEUS 22 CHANNEL COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM, The American journal of otology, 15, 1994, pp. 15-27
Sixty-three postlinguistically deaf adults from four English-speaking
countries participated in a 17-week field study of performance with a
new speech coding strategy, Spectral Peak (SPEAK), and the most widely
used strategy, Multipeak (MPEAK), both of which are implemented on we
arable speech processors of the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant Sy
stem; MPEAK is a feature-extraction strategy, whereas SPEAK is a filte
rbank strategy. Subjects' performance was evaluated with an experiment
al design in which use of each strategy was reversed and replicated (A
BAB). Average scores for speech tests presented sound-only at 70 dB SP
L were higher with the SPEAK strategy than with the MPEAK strategy. Fo
r tests in quiet, mean scores for medial vowels were 74.8 percent vers
us 70.1 percent; for medial consonants, 68.6 percent versus 56.6 perce
nt; for monosyllabic words, 33.8 percent versus 24.6 percent; and for
sentences, 77.5 percent versus 67.4 percent. For tests in noise, mean
scores for Four-Choice Spondees at +10 and +5 dB signal-to-noise ratio
(S/N) were 88.5 percent versus 73.6 percent and 80.1 percent versus 6
2.3 percent, respectively; and for sentences at +15 dB, +10, and +5 dB
S/N, 66.5 percent versus 43.4 percent, 61.5 percent versus 37.1 perce
nt, and 60.4 percent versus 31.7 percent, respectively. Subjects showe
d marked improvement in recognition of sentences in noise with the new
SPEAK filterbank strategy. These results agree closely with subjects'
responses to a questionnaire on which approximately 80 percent report
ed they heard best with the SPEAK strategy for everyday listening situ
ations.