1. The solitary parasitoid Anagrus delicatus attacks hosts (planthoppe
r eggs) that exist in distinct batches and that are readily detectable
to the foraging parasitoid. However, Anagrus delicatus attacks only a
small fraction of the available hosts within a batch of eggs and then
disperses (Cronin & Strong, 1993a). Here we address the question: Why
is A. delicatus abandoning seemingly high quality patches? 2. A paras
itoid with an imperfect ability to discriminate between unparasitized
hosts and hosts that it has attacked earlier within the same patch exp
eriences a risk of self-superparasitism when attacking multiple hosts
within a single patch. Self-superparasitism can incur costs in the for
m of lost time and eggs. Early patch leaving can be favoured as a mean
s of avoiding the costs of self-superparasitism. 3. A simple static mo
del demonstrates that patch leaving is favoured by low costs of travel
ling to a new patch, high error rates in discriminating previously sel
f-parasitized hosts, and high levels of parasitism in the currently oc
cupied patch. 4. A more detailed dynamic state variable model, paramet
erized for A. delicatus, demonstrates that this parasitoid's seemingly
enigmatic behaviour can be explained under our hypothesis. In order f
or this to be the case, we predicted that A.delicatus cannot recognize
previously parasitized hosts. Subsequent to our prediction, Cronin &
Strong (1993b) demonstrated that experienced A.delicatus do not avoid
ovipositing in previously self-parasitized hosts. 5. Optimal patch lea
ving rules can be highly sensitive to even very low host discriminatio
n error rates, which may be widespread among parasitoids.