The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy of 3 different therap
eutic protocols in the treatment of patients with WHO class IV lupus n
ephritis and normal renal function. We carried out a randomized prospe
ctive trial. The treatment programs consisted of a standard therapy re
gimen alone (protocol A), plus plasmapheresis (protocol B) or pulse me
thylprednisolone (protocol C), followed by a slow (protocols A and B)
or fast (protocol C) prednisone tapering schedule. Statistical analysi
s was performed, using univariate survival analysis according to Kapla
n Meier and Breslow's test to compare survival curves. Eighteen patien
ts entered the study: 6 protocol A, 5 protocol B and 7 protocol C. No
patients developed renal insufficiency. Moreover, no statistical diffe
rences in the probability of inducing partial or complete disease remi
ssion and in reducing 24-hour urinary protein excretion to less-than-o
r-equal-to 2 g per day were observed among the groups. Protocols A and
B were more effective in comparison with protocol C in decreasing 24-
hour urinary protein excretion to less-than-or-equal-to 0.5 g and less
-than-or-equal-to 0.2 g per day. In conclusion, a slow prednisone tape
ring schedule is more effective in reducing 24-hour urinary protein ex
cretion to less-than-or-equal-to 0.5 and less-than-or-equal-to 0.1 g p
er day as compared with a fast prednisone tapering schedule, even if i
t is preceded by methylprednisolone pulse therapy.