We analyse mathematical models of the evolution of a trait that determ
ines ability in contest competition. We assume that the value of the c
ompetitive trait affects two different components of fitness, one meas
uring the benefit of winning contests and the other measuring the cost
of developing the competitive trait. Unlike previous analyses, we inc
lude the population dynamical consequences of larger competitive trait
values. Exaggeration of the competitive trait reduces the mean probab
ility of survival during the non-competitive stage of the life cycle.
The resulting lower population density reduces competition and, theref
ore, reduces the advantages of greater competitive ability. Models wit
hout population dynamics often predict dimorphism in the competitive t
rait when resource possession is decided by interactions with many oth
er individuals. If the competition involves a contest with a single ot
her individual, models without population dynamics often predict cycle
s of increase and collapse in the trait or a continual increase, possi
bly resulting in extinction. When population dynamics are included, bo
th of these results become less likely and a single stable trait value
becomes more likely. Population dynamics also make it possible to hav
e dimorphism when individuals have a single pairwise contest and alter
native stable trait values when an individual has many contests. Incre
ases in the value of the resource being contested may increase or decr
ease the evolutionarily stable size of the trait. Competition between
very differently sized species will often decrease size in the larger
species (character convergence).