Bo. Anderson et al., TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND OPERATIVE SELECTION FOR EARLY CARCINOMA OF THE RECTUM, Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 179(5), 1994, pp. 513-517
BACKGROUND: Transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) supplements clinical ev
aluation of early carcinoma of the rectum in selecting patients for lo
cal operative therapy, such as transanal excision (TAE). STUDY DESIGN:
This study was done to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasonographic stag
ing of tumor depth (T stage) in patients with suspected early carcinom
a of the rectum, to compare ultrasonographic with clinical T-staging a
ccuracies within this patient group, to determine if any specific tumo
r characteristics (configuration, size, location) predispose toward ul
trasonographic T-staging inaccuracy, and to examine the role of TRUS i
n operative selection for patients with early carcinoma of the rectum.
RESULTS Between April 1990 and December 1992, 62 patients with primar
y carcinoma of the rectum underwent ultrasonographic staging (uT), whe
reby three uT(4), 27 uT(3), 24 uT(2) and eight uT(1) carcinomas were i
dentified. Of the 32 patients with suspected intramural (uT(1) or uT(2
)) disease, 27 underwent prompt operative excision or resection at our
institution, allowing comparative histopathologic staging. in this hi
ghly selected patient subset, uT(1) staging was correct in all instanc
es; uT(2) staging was incorrect in 45 percent of instances, with 30 pe
rcent having unpredicted transmural penetration. Ultrasonographic and
clinical staging accuracies were quantitatively similar, and no tumor
characteristics were consistently associated with ultrasonographic imp
recision. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with clinically suspected early
carcinoma of the rectum, the decision to perform TAE is supported by u
ltrasonographic T-1 staging. By contrast, the decision to perform TAE
cannot be based solely on ultrasonographic T-2 staging, because of the
possibility for transmural penetration of tumor.