Da. Rodeberg et al., IMPROVED VENTILATORY FUNCTION IN BURN PATIENTS USING VOLUMETRIC DIFFUSIVE RESPIRATION, Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 179(5), 1994, pp. 518-522
BACKGROUND: Volumetric diffusive respiration (VDR) offers theoretical
advantages over conventional mechanical ventilation (CV) by using lowe
r airway pressures, recruiting alveoli, and mobilizing secretions. STU
DY DESIGN: Forty-eight thermally injured pediatric patients with faili
ng respiratory status were changed from CV to VDR. Data were obtained
just before transition for CV and after stabilization on VDR, within s
ix hours of transition. RESULTS: Both ventilation and oxygenation were
significantly improved with PaCO2 decreasing from 47+/-3 to 39+/-11 m
m Hg and PaO2 increasing from 105+/-8 to 171+/-12 mm Hg after transiti
on to VDR. Treatment with the VDR ventilator also resulted in a signif
icant decrease in peak inspiratory pressures (PIP) from 52+/-2 to 38+/
-2 cm H2O. The PaO2 to FiO(2) ratio increased from 189+/-16 using CV,
to 329+/-21 using VDR, suggesting an improvement in the ventilation an
d perfusion matching. Ventilatory efficiency, measured by the PaO2/FiO
(2)/PIP ratio, greatly improved after transition from CV to VDR with f
raction of inspired oxygen increasing from 3.9+/-0.4 to 10.3+/-1.0. He
modynamic function (blood pressure and pulse rate) were not adversely
affected by VDR. CONCLUSIONS: The VDR ventilator is more effective tha
n conventional ventilation for maintaining optimal gas exchange at low
er airway pressures in thermally injured pediatric patients.