NONPERTURBATIVE OCEAN ACOUSTIC TOMOGRAPHY INVERSION OF 1000-KM PULSE-PROPAGATION IN THE PACIFIC-OCEAN

Citation
Rm. Jones et al., NONPERTURBATIVE OCEAN ACOUSTIC TOMOGRAPHY INVERSION OF 1000-KM PULSE-PROPAGATION IN THE PACIFIC-OCEAN, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96(5), 1994, pp. 3054-3063
Citations number
49
Categorie Soggetti
Acoustics
ISSN journal
00014966
Volume
96
Issue
5
Year of publication
1994
Part
1
Pages
3054 - 3063
Database
ISI
SICI code
0001-4966(1994)96:5<3054:NOATIO>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
A nonperturbative inversion was performed of acoustic tomography measu rements made in the northeastern Pacific Ocean in July 1989, in which acoustic transmissions from a 250-Hz broadband source located near the sound-channel axis were recorded at a long vertical array of hydropho nes 1000 km away. In contrast with a conventional inversion, this nonp erturbative inversion does not assume that travel times are linearly r elated to the sound-speed deviations from a background sound-speed mod el. The inversion process involved three steps: (1) Measured pulse tra vel times and the source and receiver locations were used to determine the range average of the equivalent symmetric sound-slowness profile. That part of the inversion used only curve fitting and Abel transform s, and required independent (nontomographic) information only to help identify the pulse arrivals. (2) Under the assumption that the range d ependence of sound speed was small, we used the reciprocal of the rang e-averaged sound-slowness profile to approximate the range average of the sound-speed profile. (3) Constraining the sound speed below the so und-channel axis to match climatological data and neglecting the range dependence of sound speed below the sound-channel axis allowed us to estimate the range average of the sound-speed profile above the sound- channel axis. This inversion was compared with the range average of so und speed calculated from CTD measurements made during the experiment over a 10-day period. The agreement was good between 50- and 300-m dep ths, but there were some disagreements near the surface and near the s ound-channel axis.