PATIENT AND PHYSICIAN ANALYTIC GOALS FOR SELF-MONITORING BLOOD-GLUCOSE INSTRUMENTS

Citation
Sl. Weiss et al., PATIENT AND PHYSICIAN ANALYTIC GOALS FOR SELF-MONITORING BLOOD-GLUCOSE INSTRUMENTS, American journal of clinical pathology, 102(5), 1994, pp. 611-615
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Pathology
ISSN journal
00029173
Volume
102
Issue
5
Year of publication
1994
Pages
611 - 615
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9173(1994)102:5<611:PAPAGF>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
The study's objective was to determine the maximum analytical error th at is allowable in portable whole blood glucose meters. Interviews wer e conducted to derive personal reference values and significant deviat ions from these values for the limit of hypoglycemia, the limit of hyp erglycemia, and the upper and lower limits of acceptable blood glucose for physicians and patients with diabetes at the Park Nicollet Medica l Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Fifty patients with diabetes (30 typ e I and 20 type II), and 43 physicians (14 endocrinologists, 14 family practitioners, and 15 general internists) were enrolled in the study. The results showed no significant differences between type I and type II diabetic patient responses. Nor were there significant differences among family practitioner, internist, and endocrinologist responses f or any of the parameters (the limit of hypoglycemia, the limit of hype rglycemia, the upper and lower limits of acceptable blood glucose for the patient, and the corresponding allowable coefficients of variation at each of these glucose levels). There were significant differences when patients were compared to physicians. Physicians require the high est degree of precision at the limit of hyperglycemia (8.4 +/- 0.28 mm ol/L [150.8 +/- 5.1 mg/dl]) with a maximum allowable coefficient of va riation (CV) of 7%, a CV significantly lower than that of the patients (CV = 10%). Patients require the highest precision for glucose concen tration around the lower acceptable limit (4.7 +/- .013 mmol/L [84.1 /- 2.5 mg/dL]), with an allowable CV of 8%, a CV significantly lower t han that of the physicians (CV = 14%). The authors conclude that the a ccuracy required by patients and physicians at normal and higher gluco se concentrations is achievable by currently available meters. Manufac turers should ascertain that glucose measurements are optimally accura te at glucose levels of 4.7 mmol/L (84.1 mg/dL) and have CVs no higher than 7%.