Qualitative judgments play an important role in decision making under
uncertainty by providing plausible interpretations and justifications
for various belief measures. This paper presents some new results and
a critical review on qualitative judgments, which extends the initial
investigation of de Finetti and Savage on qualitative probability, the
work of Dubois on qualitative necessity/possibility, and the study of
Wong et. al. on qualitative belief/plausibility. The results of this
study not only complement the analysis on quantitative belief measures
, but also lay the ground work for developing a utility theory with no
n-additive belief measures.