The role of clinical trials is becoming extremely important for our un
derstanding of the effects of different therapeutic modalities of canc
er treatment and the value of their interactions. Participation of pat
ients in clinical trials remains disappointingly low, with less than 3
% of the estimated 1.17 million patients with newly diagnosed cancers
entering the studies. Several physician-based factors hinder accrual o
f patients-(1) lack of awareness of or access to clinical trials, (2)
physician bias that the trial therapy is not as good as the ''standard
therapy'' even though the standard therapy may provide a response rat
e of less than 20%, (3) physician's concern about losing patients to f
ollow-up, (4) the complexity of the clinical trial(s), which requires
excessive amount of time to discuss, implement, and follow-up the pati
ent, (5) the lack of equitable compensation for the physician's time a
nd effort, and (6) excessive costs of laboratory and radiologic tests
that are not paid by the agency or group sponsoring the study, particu
larly in Phase I and II trials. These factors are confounded by the la
ck of institutional review boards in several community hospitals, asso
ciated with a complex and lengthy procedure to institute such a board.
The article presents recent surveys dealing with attitudes and practi
ces of health care providers toward clinical trials. The National Canc
er Institute, the American Cancer Society, and other societies, groups
, and agencies, including the health insurance industry, should contin
ue to encourage and support clinical trials.