The growth of environmental ethics as an academic discipline has not b
een accompanied by any cultural movement toward sustainability. Indice
s of ecological degradation steadily increase, and many of the legisla
tive gains made during the 1970s have been lost during the Reagan-Bush
anti-environmental revolution. This situation gives rise to questions
about the efficacy of ecophilosophical discourse. We argue (1) that t
hese setbacks reflect, on the one hand, the skillful use of rhetorical
tools by anti-environmental factions and, on the other, the indiffere
nce (even hostility) of the ecophilosophical community toward rhetoric
, (2) that since the linguistic turn in philosophy, no rigid line of d
emarcation can be maintained between rhetoric and philosophy, and (3)
that rhetoric offers resources to the ecophilosophical community that
increase its potential to effect change in society.