GENOTOXICITY AND CARCINOGENICITY TESTING OF 1,2-DIBROMOPROPANE AND 1,1,3-TRIBROMOPROPANE IN COMPARISON TO 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE

Citation
Ga. Belitsky et al., GENOTOXICITY AND CARCINOGENICITY TESTING OF 1,2-DIBROMOPROPANE AND 1,1,3-TRIBROMOPROPANE IN COMPARISON TO 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE, Cell biology and toxicology, 10(4), 1994, pp. 265-279
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Cytology & Histology",Toxicology
Journal title
ISSN journal
07422091
Volume
10
Issue
4
Year of publication
1994
Pages
265 - 279
Database
ISI
SICI code
0742-2091(1994)10:4<265:GACTO1>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
The activities of 1,2-dibromopropane (DBP) and 1,1,3-tribromopropane ( TBP) were studied in seven genotoxicity assays, (i) SOS-induction in E . coli, (ii) DNA repair in primary rat hepatocyte culture, (iii) the S almonella/microsome assay, (iv) a host-mediated assay using Salmonella , (v) the somatic mutation and recombination assay in Drosophila melan ogaster, (vi) HGPRT-mutagenesis assay in ARL 18 cells, and (vii) micro nucleus formation assay in mouse polychromatophylic erythrocytes (PCE) , forestomach (FS), glandular stomach (GS), duodenum (D), jejunum (J), cecum (C) and liver (L). The halopropanes were also tested for tumor formation in the fish Danio rerio. DBP was active in assays (ii), (v), (vii FS) and (vii L). TBP was positive in assays (ii) and (iii), stro ngly positive in (vii L) and borderline positive in (iv). However, nei ther DBP nor TBP induced tumors in fish, in contrast to the carcinogen ic 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane. The genotoxicity and potential carcino genicity of DBP and TBP in mammals is discussed.