Ga. Belitsky et al., GENOTOXICITY AND CARCINOGENICITY TESTING OF 1,2-DIBROMOPROPANE AND 1,1,3-TRIBROMOPROPANE IN COMPARISON TO 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE, Cell biology and toxicology, 10(4), 1994, pp. 265-279
The activities of 1,2-dibromopropane (DBP) and 1,1,3-tribromopropane (
TBP) were studied in seven genotoxicity assays, (i) SOS-induction in E
. coli, (ii) DNA repair in primary rat hepatocyte culture, (iii) the S
almonella/microsome assay, (iv) a host-mediated assay using Salmonella
, (v) the somatic mutation and recombination assay in Drosophila melan
ogaster, (vi) HGPRT-mutagenesis assay in ARL 18 cells, and (vii) micro
nucleus formation assay in mouse polychromatophylic erythrocytes (PCE)
, forestomach (FS), glandular stomach (GS), duodenum (D), jejunum (J),
cecum (C) and liver (L). The halopropanes were also tested for tumor
formation in the fish Danio rerio. DBP was active in assays (ii), (v),
(vii FS) and (vii L). TBP was positive in assays (ii) and (iii), stro
ngly positive in (vii L) and borderline positive in (iv). However, nei
ther DBP nor TBP induced tumors in fish, in contrast to the carcinogen
ic 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane. The genotoxicity and potential carcino
genicity of DBP and TBP in mammals is discussed.