This work was conducted as part of a broad-based effort to determine t
he factors that affect cation formation for organometallic aluminum co
mplexes. Previous studies have shown that the cationic complexes [R(2)
Al(NH(2)(t)Bu)(2)]X result from the combination of R(2)AlX and excess
NH(2)(t)Bu when X = Br and I. In the present study the effect of repla
cing one alkyl group with the relatively bulky aryloxide (2,6-di-tert-
butyl phenoxide = PhO) to yield complexes of formula [Me(Ph*O)AlX](2)
(X = Cl (1), Br (2)) was examined. With excess NH(2)(t)Bu only the ad
duct species formed, Me(PhO)AlX(NH(2)(t)Bu) (where X = Cl (3)), Br (4
)). In using R(2)AlI a different type of reaction occurs and only PhO
AlMe(2)(NH(2)(t)Bu) (5) and [NH(3)(t)Bu]I are obtained. Of related int
erest, the compound Me(2)(PhO)Al(THF) (6) is also reported. The prese
nce of 4 as an adduct species indicates that the inductive effect of t
he aryloxide prevents cation formation where X = Br, in contrast to th
e complexes which possess only alkyl. All of the compounds were charac
terized by mp, H-1 NMR, IR, elemental analyses, and in some cases, X-r
ay crystallography. X-ray data: (1) monoclinic, P2(1)/n, a = 10.604(1)
, b = 20.776(4), c = 14.752(1) Angstrom, beta = 92.450(1)degrees, V =
3247.1(7) Angstrom(3), Z = 4, with 3245 reflections with F > 4.0 sigma
F, R = 0.0436; (3) orthorhombic, Pna2(1), a = 16.879(2), b = 12.315(2
), c = 10.442(1) Angstrom, V = 2170.5(5) Angstrom(3), Z = 4, With 1270
reflections with F > 4.0 sigma F, R = 0.0477; (5) orthorhombic, Pna2(
1), a = 17.111(3), b = 12.375(1), c = 10.380(1) Angstrom, V = 2197.7(5
) Angstrom(3), Z = 4, with 1226 reflections with F > 4.0 sigma F, R =
0.0538.