Hb. Kaplan et Kr. Damphousse, NEGATIVE SOCIAL SANCTIONS, SELF-DEROGATION, AND DEVIANT-BEHAVIOR - MAIN AND INTERACTIVE EFFECTS IN LONGITUDINAL PERSPECTIVE, Deviant behavior, 18(1), 1997, pp. 1-26
This article reports the results of a multiple regression model that u
sed longitudinal data (N = 2,545) to examine the interactive effects o
f negative social sanctions and self-derogation on deviant behavior (n
et of the effect of earlier deviant behavior). The analysis was based
on the notion that some of the apparently contradictory evidence surro
unding the examination of the labeling perspective may lie in a failur
e of researchers to focus on the conditions under which the labeling e
ffect may or may not be appropriate. Some studies, for example, have s
hown that higher status individuals (Whites, males, those with higher
socioeconomic status) are more at risk for escalating deviance after b
ecoming labeled a deviant than their lower status counterparts. It is
theoretically important, therefore, to seek other subgroups for which
labeling theory holds (and does not hold) to help explain the inconsis
tent findings. Specifically, this study examined the extent to which s
elf-rejection moderated the relationship between negative social sanct
ions and deviance in addition to exercising direct and mediating effec
ts. A positive main effect of self-derogation at Time 1 was observed o
n deviance at Time 3, and a strong positive effect of negative social
sanctions at Time 2 was observed on deviance at Time 3, controlling fo
r earlier deviance. Importantly, for those respondents with low levels
of self-derogation, a positive effect of negative social sanctions on
later deviance was observed. This effect was considerably weaker, how
ever, for those who reported high levels of self-derogation, although
the relationship between the two concepts was still positive. Thus, hi
ghly self-derogating individuals who were sanctioned appeared to engag
e in increased levels of later deviance, net of earlier deviance (the
labeling effect). The labeling effect was significantly stronger, howe
ver, for those who had very low levels of self-derogation.