This study examines the politics underlying the implementation of a sm
oking ban in public facilities, including restaurants and bars. The an
alysis is grounded in interviews with the moral entrepreneurs who spea
rheaded the antismoking crusade and the status quo defenders who oppos
ed it, a content analysis of letters to the editor, and data on the pr
o- and antiban letter writers' cumulative property values. The finding
s reveal that moral entrepreneurs and proban letter writers focused on
health risks thought to be associated with secondhand smoke; their op
ponents focused on the individual right to smoke. As expected, status
also differentiates the pro- and antiban groups, consistent with theor
izing about the role of status politics in the creation of deviant typ
es.