Cd. Monks et al., EFFECT OF AC-263,222, IMAZETHAPYR, AND NICOSULFURON ON WEED-CONTROL AND IMIDAZOLINONE-TOLERANT CORN (ZEA-MAYS) YIELD, Weed technology, 10(4), 1996, pp. 822-827
Imidazolinone herbicides injure currently available commercial field c
orn cultivars; however, cultivars resistant to these herbicides have b
een developed. Sicklepod, Texas panicum, and annual morningglory contr
ol using AC 263,222 (36 and 72 g ai/ha), imazethapyr (36 and 72 g ai/h
a), or nicosulfuron (35 g ai/ha) applied POST at 2, 4, and 6 wk after
planting were evaluated in imidazolinone-tolerant corn. Studies were c
onducted at Attapulgus and Plains, Georgia from 1992 through 1933, Nic
osulfuron and AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha controlled Texas panicum at least
87% when applied 2 wk after planting. Imazethapyr did not consistently
control Texas panicum or sicklepod, regardless of application rate. A
C 263,222 at both rates and nicosulfuron controlled sicklepod at least
86% when applied 2 wk after planting; however, later application or a
pplication under dry conditions generally resulted in reduced control.
All herbicides controlled the entireleaf and pitted morningglory comp
lex at least 84% when applied 2 wk after planting. Imidazolinone-toler
ant corn was tolerant to all herbicides, regardless of rate and tintin
g, and generally yielded greater when weeds were controlled early in t
he season.