USE OF INCORPORATED AND NON-INCORPORATED GRANULAR TRIFLURALIN FOR ANNUAL GRASS CONTROL IN BARLEY (HORDEUM-VULGARE), WHEAT (TRITICUM-AESTIVUM), AND CANOLA (BRASSICA-NAPUS)
Kj. Kirkland, USE OF INCORPORATED AND NON-INCORPORATED GRANULAR TRIFLURALIN FOR ANNUAL GRASS CONTROL IN BARLEY (HORDEUM-VULGARE), WHEAT (TRITICUM-AESTIVUM), AND CANOLA (BRASSICA-NAPUS), Weed technology, 10(4), 1996, pp. 907-913
The comparison of incorporation vs no incorporation on a mid-October a
pplication of the granular formulation of trifluralin to control infes
tations of wild oat and green foxtail was evaluated in spring barley,
wheat, and canola in west central Saskatchewan over a 3 yr period, Inc
orporation treatments consisted of: no incorporation, one incorporatio
n in fall, one incorporation in fall and a second in spring, one incor
poration in fall and two additional incorporations in spring, All trea
tments eliminated green foxtail, In all three crops wild oat panicle c
ounts were equivalent from incorporated and non-incorporated triflural
in, Wild oat fresh weights in crops grown on stubble were similar for
incorporated and non-incorporated trifluralin, In fallow crops, wild o
at fresh weight reductions were greater in three of nine site years wi
th incorporation, There was little difference in crop yields from inco
rporated and non-incorporated trifluralin.