Background and Study Aims: The most widely used endoscopic procedures
in the management of patients with bleeding peptic ulcer are at presen
t sclerotherapy and thermal methods. In an attempt to assess the most
effective method of achieving hemostasis, we compared injection sclero
therapy and laser photocoagulation in terms of the efficacy of initial
hemostasis, rebleeding, need for surgery, mortality, and the appearan
ce of the ulcer after the hemostatic procedure. Patients and Methods:
In this prospective, randomized trial, 160 patients were treated with
injection sclerotherapy (1% polidocanol), and 155 patients with laser
photocoagulation (Nd:YAG laser) in cases of Forrest I, Forrest IIa, an
d Forrest IIb hemorrhage. The bleeding activity was classified accordi
ng to the modified Forrest criteria. Polidocanol injection and Nd:YAG
laser photocoagulation were not preceded by epinephrine administration
. Results: There were no significant overall differences between the g
roups in the outcome in terms of definitive hemostasis, rebleeding, ur
gent surgery, and death (p = 0.487). In the case of the subgroup with
Forrest I lesions, laser photocoagulation was more efficacious than sc
lerotherapy (p = 0.0078), In the Forrest IIa and Forrest IIb subgroups
, the two methods were equally effective (p = 0.202 and 0.513 respecti
vely). In the sclerotherapy patients, definitive initial hemostasis in
Forrest IIa was achieved in 100%, whereas in the laser group this rat
e was 92%, with 28% of patients initially developing hemorrhage after
one or two laser pulses, Ulcer healing was slower following sclerother
apy than after photocoagulation. Conclusion: Injection sclerotherapy a
nd laser photocoagulation are equally effective in achieving definitiv
e hemostasis in bleeding peptic ulcers, Laser photocoagulation is more
efficacious in patients with active bleeding, whereas injection scler
otherapy is more effective in patients with a nonbleeding visible vess
el.