M. Gerstein et al., THE VOLUME OF ATOMS ON THE PROTEIN SURFACE - CALCULATED FROM SIMULATION, USING VORONOI POLYHEDRA, Journal of Molecular Biology, 249(5), 1995, pp. 955-966
We analyze the volume of atoms on the protein surface during a molecul
ar-dynamics simulation of a small protein (pancreatic trypsin inhibito
r). To calculate volumes, we use a particular geometric construction,
called Voronoi polyhedra, that divides the total volume of the simulat
ion box amongst the atoms, rendering them relatively larger or smaller
depending on how tightly they are packed. We find that most of the at
oms on the protein surface are larger than those buried in the core (b
y similar to 6%), except for the charged atoms, which decrease in size
, presumably due to electroconstriction. We also find that water molec
ules are larger near apolar atoms on the protein surface and smaller n
ear charged atoms, in comparison to ''bulk'' water molecules far from
the protein. Taken together, these findings necessarily imply that apo
lar atoms on the protein surface and their associated water molecules
are less tightly packed (than corresponding atoms in the protein core
and bulk water) and the opposite is the case for charged atoms. This l
ooser apolar packing and tighter charged packing fundamentally reflect
s protein-water distances that are larger or smaller than those expect
ed from van der Waals radii. In addition to the calculation of mean vo
lumes, simulations allow us to investigate the volume fluctuations and
hence compressibilities of the protein and solvent atoms. The relativ
ely large volume fluctuations of atoms at the protein-water interface
indicates that they have a more variable packing than corresponding at
oms in the protein core or in bulk water. We try to adhere to traditio
nal conventions throughout our calculations. Nevertheless, we are awar
e of and discuss three complexities that significantly qualify our cal
culations: the positioning of the dividing plane between atoms, the pr
oblem of vertex error, and the choice of atom radii. In particular, ou
r results highlight how poor a ''compromise'' the commonly accepted va
lue of 1.4 Angstrom is for the radius of a water molecule.