Sm. Thomas et al., PATENTING OF RECOMBINANT PROTEINS - AN ANALYSIS OF TISSUE-PLASMINOGENACTIVATOR (T-PA) IN EUROPE, THE UNITED-STATES AND JAPAN, Research policy, 24(4), 1995, pp. 645-663
The development of appropriate intellectual property protection for bi
otechnology is crucial for the industries which apply and develop it.
This paper examines the issues concerning the patenting of recombinant
proteins by analysing the recent judicial decisions relating to tissu
e-plasminogen activator (t-PA), a therapeutic protein drug. This recen
t litigation is important because of the apparent coincident invention
of t-PA and variants in different laboratories. Such developments ari
se as many major R&D efforts are directed at common therapeutic goals.
This study focuses on the issues of non-obviousness and scope with re
spect to both the invention itself and the production of second genera
tion and subsequent compounds that may readily be created by the appli
cation of powerful recombinant DNA techniques. Three companies, Genent
ech (San Francisco, CA, USA), Wellcome (Beckenham, UK) and Toyobo (Ots
u, Shiba, Japan) were involved in three separate court actions over cl
aims to recombinant t-PA. We demonstrate that biotechnology patents wi
th broad claims have been upheld and as a consequence have led to the
curtailment of modified variants with potentially useful pharmacologic
al properties. There is, therefore, a clear need for public policies w
hich address these complex issues. We argue that such policies should
both reward the inventor and facilitate maximum exploitation of this l
imited natural biological resource by greater specificity of patent cl
aims.