Limitations in understanding the relationship between occupational and
environmental exposures and disease present opportunities for using b
iological markers to fill gaps in knowledge. Three situations can be i
dentified that could foster the development and use of biomarkers, whe
re epidemiological evidence is (1) definitive, (2) equivocal, and (3)
lacking. When there is clear epidemiological evidence of disease risk
given an exposure, biomarkers could be used to identify high- and low-
risk subsets of a cohort that might benefit from differential practice
s such as counseling about job risks, varying frequency and intensity
of medical surveillance, and using protective equipment. Biomarkers co
uld also be used to test the effectiveness of environmental controls.
Assessment of blood lead in bridge workers and purified protein deriva
tive (PPD) testing in health care workers illustrates biomarkers that
have been used to evaluate control efforts. When epidemiological evide
nce is equivocal, a broad and consistent database on intermediate biom
arkers in the path between exposure and disease could provide a compel
ling case as to whether a substance should be treated as hazardous. Th
e case of ethylene oxide illustrates this situation: the epidemiologic
al evidence of risk of lymphohematopoietic cancer is equivocal but the
re is an informative database on genetic and cytogenetic changes in va
rious species consistent with carcinogenicity. Biomarker data also can
be used to assist in the interpretation of inconclusive epidemiologic
al information as is illustrated in the case of styrene where markers
provide a mechanistic rationale for the epidemiologic findings. When t
here is little or no epidemiological evidence of risk in an exposure s
ituation, such as around hazardous waste operations or with new techno
logies, biological markers can serve as early warning indicators of ex
posure or risk. In such cases it is important to have an underlying bi
ological theory and an appropriate epidemiological study design if the
principal results are to be of value in indicating risk and preventin
g disease.