BONE LOSS AFTER HYSTERECTOMY WITH OVARIAN CONSERVATION

Citation
Nr. Watson et al., BONE LOSS AFTER HYSTERECTOMY WITH OVARIAN CONSERVATION, Obstetrics and gynecology, 86(1), 1995, pp. 72-77
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Obsetric & Gynecology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00297844
Volume
86
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
72 - 77
Database
ISI
SICI code
0029-7844(1995)86:1<72:BLAHWO>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Objective: To examine the long-term effects of hysterectomy with conse rvation of the ovaries on bone density of the lumbar spine and proxima l femur. Methods: A cross-sectional study of the bone density of 40 po stmenopausal women who had undergone hysterectomy with ovarian conserv ation before menopause compared with a matched group of 40 women who h ad not had hysterectomy. The 40 women who had undergone hysterectomy w ere also compared with a control population, using multiple linear reg ression analysis. Bone density of the femoral neck and lumbar spine wa s measured by quantitative digital radiography. Results: Bone density in the hysterectomy group Was significantly reduced at the spine (P < .05) and at the femoral neck (P < .05) compared with the matched group . Comparisons of the hysterectomy group with the reference group demon strated that in addition to significant reductions in bone density at the spine (P < .05) and hip (P < .05), bone density at the femoral nec k (P < .05), trochanter (P < .05), Ward's triangle (P < .05), and the second (P < .05) and fourth (P < .05) lumbar vertebrae was also signif itcantly less in the hysterectomy group. Conclusion: Premenopausal wom en who have hysterectomy will have significantly lower bone density th an controls, despite conservation of both ovaries at the time of surge ry.