BACKGROUND: Insulin treatment in patients with type II diabetes mellit
us (DMII) is normally undertaken by clinical criteria. The aim of the
present was to study the efficacy of a standard mixed meal (breakfast
test) to predict the need for insulinotherapy to thereby evaluate whet
her it is possible to obtain more objective criteria for the indicatio
n of insulin treatment. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with DMII were stu
died to evaluate the need for insulinotheapy over a one year period. S
erum glucose and basal C peptide and their maximum values were determi
ned In all the patients following stimulation with the breakfast test
Insulin treatment was initiated according to exclusively clinical crit
eria during admission. The patients were followed as out patients for
a minimum of 3 months. Treatment at the end of follow up (insulin or n
o insulin) was evaluated and the results of the test were retrospectiv
ely analyzed. RESULTS: The basal C peptide (BCP) values were significa
ntly lower In the individuals requiring insulin in comparison to those
who did not require Insulin (($) over bar +/- SD 0.64 +/- 0.28 versus
1.18 +/- 0.41 nmol/l, p < 0.0001) similar to what was found with the
stimulated maximum C peptide values (MCP) (1.48 +/- 0.77 versus 2.49 /- 0.63 nmol/l, p < 0.0001). On considering a BCP of less than 0.9 nmo
l/l for the patients with insulin treatment the sensitivity of BCP was
83.6% and the specificity 78.9%. For a BCP value of less than 1.9 nmo
l/l sensitivity was 77.7% and specificity 78.9%. Using the values toge
ther, sensitivity was 66.6% and specificity 84.4%. Conclusions: The br
eakfast test Is useful to Indicate the need for Insulinotherapy in pat
ients with type II diabetes mellitus but is not more useful than a det
ermination of isolated basal C peptide.