Afmm. Rahman et al., ROLE OF GABAERGIC SYSTEMS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF MORPHINE-TOLERANCE INFORMALIN-TREATED MICE, Japanese Journal of Pharmacology, 68(2), 1995, pp. 207-211
Since the development of tolerance to morphine antinociception in form
alin-treated mice was delayed and diazepam normalized the delay, the i
nvolvement of GABAergic systems in the process was investigated. Gamma
amino-n-butyric acid (GABA) at 10 mg/kg and the GABA(A)-receptor agon
ist muscimol at 0.05 mg/kg, i.p., 30 min before daily morphine injecti
on at 10 mg/kg, s.c. completely reversed the delay in the development
of morphine tolerance in the formalin-treated mice. The GABA(A) antago
nist bicuculline at 1 mg/kg and the Cl--channel blocker picrotoxin at
1 mg/kg extinguished the reverse effect of muscimol and GABA(A) respec
tively. In contrast, the GABA, antagonist CGP 35348 (3-aminopropane-di
ethoxymethyl-phosphinic acid) up to 100 mg/kg, i.p. failed to abolish
the GABA effect; and baclofen, a GABA(A)-receptor agonist, at 0.5 and
2 mg/kg, i.p., 30 min before morphine was without effect on the delay.
On the other hand, bicuculline was incapable of abolishing the revers
e effects of diazepam on the delay of tolerance development; and likew
ise, the reverse effect of muscimol was not affected by flumazenil. No
appreciable influence of these GABA-related compounds was seen on mor
phine antinociception itself nor the development of tolerance in norma
l mice. These results suggest that the benzodiazepine-GABA(A)-Cl- chan
nel complex is involved in the mechanism underlying the delay of the d
evelopment of morphine tolerance in formalin-treated mice; however, it
is deduced that benzodiazepine-receptor and GABAergic systems are not
always functionally coupled to each other in the mechanisms.