Cataractogenesis by ultraviolet radiation (UVR) has been shown convinc
ingly by a host of different laboratory studies. However, crucial epid
emiological evidence linking chronic UVR exposure to age-related catar
act appears to be lacking, since different environmental studies have
led to apparently conflicting results. This paper explores a possible
explanation for these conflicting results: errors in dosimetry. Any ep
idemiological study depends upon good dosimetry of the subjects' expos
ures. A careful examination of the biophysical, physiological and beha
vioral factors which determine the level of UVR exposure of the lens r
eveals a number of surprises which should explain the apparently confl
icting epidemiological results. It is shown that geometrical and behav
ioral factors related to sunlight are so important, that by overlookin
g these factors, past epidemiological studies of UVR and cataract coul
d readily be expected to produce conflicting results.