RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF A DAILY DIARY FOR PREMENSTRUAL-SYNDROME

Citation
Ew. Freeman et al., RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF A DAILY DIARY FOR PREMENSTRUAL-SYNDROME, Psychiatry research, 65(2), 1996, pp. 97-106
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry,Psychiatry
Journal title
ISSN journal
01651781
Volume
65
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
97 - 106
Database
ISI
SICI code
0165-1781(1996)65:2<97:RAVOAD>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Daily ratings of symptoms are essential to confirm a diagnosis of prem enstrual syndrome (PMS). The 17-item Daily Symptom Report (DSR) is rel atively brief and appropriate for clinical and primary care settings. We report the reliability, factor structure and relationships with oth er standard mood measures of the DSR as a measure of PMS. The sample i ncludes 170 women who sought medical treatment for severe PMS and a no n-clinical comparison group of 54 healthy women in the same age range. Cronbach's coefficient alpha was 0.92 for the premenstrual DSR scores , indicating very high internal consistency for the 17 symptoms. Facto r analysis yielded four factors describing mood, behavioral items, pai n, and physical symptoms. In the PMS sample, there were moderate corre lations between the DSR and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, the Profile of Mood States, and the Premenstrual Assessment Form. The moderate correlations of the DSR with other standard symptom measures add to the evidence that PMS overlaps with other mood disorders at the premenstrual time but is not simply a brief depression or a truncated anxiety disorder. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.