THE HEIDELBERG INTENSIVE WARD SCORE - DEVELOPMENT OF A COMPUTERIZED SCORING SYSTEM FOR DOCUMENTATION OF THE COURSE OF TREATMENT AND ASSESSMENT OF THE PROGNOSIS OF SURGICAL PATIENTS IN INTENSIVE-CARE
T. Foitzik et al., THE HEIDELBERG INTENSIVE WARD SCORE - DEVELOPMENT OF A COMPUTERIZED SCORING SYSTEM FOR DOCUMENTATION OF THE COURSE OF TREATMENT AND ASSESSMENT OF THE PROGNOSIS OF SURGICAL PATIENTS IN INTENSIVE-CARE, Chirurg, 66(5), 1995, pp. 513-518
Existing scoring systems have failed to reflect the pathophysiological
changes during ICU therapy, and do not provide reliable criteria for
the prediction of outcome in surgical patients. The aim of the present
project was to establish a comprehensive scoring system for dally eva
luation of physiological parameters and therapeutic interventions in a
surgical intensive care unit, and to identify score patterns in the c
ourse of ICU treatment to be used for prospective clinical decisions.
In a prospective study of 123 consecutive patients who required intens
ive care for more than two consecutive days we documented 10 physiolog
ical parameters and a set of 14 therapeutic interventions on a daily b
asis over a to: tal of 1274 days. Evaluation of the new scoring system
, called the Heidelberg Intensive Ward Score (HDWS), included comparis
on with APACHE II and a set of unfavorable HDWS-patterns at different
time points during ICU treatment. All variables were implemented into
a notebook computer to be used at bedside. Neither HDWS nor APACHE II
obtained on admission differentiated between survivors and non-survivo
rs. In contrast, scores of non survivors were significantly higher tha
n scores of survivors at day 7. At that point, HDWS was superior to AP
ACHE II with respect to the predictive power as assessed by receiver o
perator characteristic curves. No patient who fulfilled all four unfav
orable HDWS-patterns during the first week of ICU treatment survived (
but these were only two patients). We conclude that the limited power
of scores obtained on admission to predict outcome in surgical patient
s may be improved by trend analysis of scores over time which also tak
e into account the patients' response to therapy. The Heidelberg Inten
sive Ward Score is a first step in the development of such a dynamic m
odel which may also allow for the definition of individual outcome cri
teria in the near future.