Pj. Wickramaratne, SELECTING CONTROL-GROUPS FOR STUDIES OF FAMILIAL AGGREGATION OF DISEASE, Journal of clinical epidemiology, 48(8), 1995, pp. 1019-1029
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath","Medicine, General & Internal
In genetic-epidemiologic studies to determine the association between
the disease status of family members, this association is measured by
comparing rates of the disease in relatives of probands (index cases)
with the disease, with the rates of the disease among individuals in a
control group. Either of two types of control groups are generally us
ed: (1) a control group consisting of a random sample from the populat
ion or the entire population if available or (2) a control group consi
sting of relatives of individuals without the disease under study. We
examine the advantages and disadvantages of using these different type
s of control groups. We show two major results for family studies: (1)
when there are no other factors associated with the disease status of
an individual other than the disease status of a family member, both
types of control groups will give a valid test of the null hypothesis
of no familial aggregation. However, tests using a population control
group will always be less efficient statistically, than those performe
d with a control group of relatives of probands without the disease un
der study, the degree of efficiency decreasing with increasing populat
ion prevalence of the disease. (2) When factors other than the disease
status of a family member are also associated with the disease status
of an individual, if this factor is a proband characteristic (which i
s not shared by relatives) population control groups cannot be adjuste
d to eliminate possible bias due to the potential confounding effect o
f this factor (unlike control groups consisting of relatives of proban
ds without the disorder).