Active and passive sampling methods are available for the determinatio
n of maximum formaldehyde concentrations and average formaldehyde conc
entrations respectively. The present work compares the performance of
an active cartridge type sampler with an impinger method and a diffusi
ve monitor which have previously been used at the Building Research Es
tablishment. Good agreement between the three methods was found in a c
omparison at two formaldehyde concentration levels. The sampling strat
egy required to obtain a representative reading of the formaldehyde co
ncentration in an indoor atmosphere was investigated using a commercia
lly available diffusive sampler. An investigation of spatial variation
in five rooms suggests that sampling in one location should give a re
presentative reading of the formaldehyde concentration in a room, prov
iding the sampler is not placed near a major source of formaldehyde. A
n initial investigation of temporal variation in six rooms found that
one three day sampling period was sufficient to obtain a representativ
e reading of the mean monthly formaldehyde concentration. Between mont
h variation was found to be higher than within month variation althoug
h no strong seasonal effects were observed. The results suggest that m
ore than one three day sampling period should be used to estimate the
annual mean formaldehyde concentration and two measurements (summer an
d winter) may be a reasonable approach. Further work in a larger numbe
r of homes is in hand to verify the effectiveness of this sampling str
ategy.