SELECTING A PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS INDEX FOR THE PREDICTION OF MEDICAL OUTCOMES USING ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIMS DATA

Citation
C. Melfi et al., SELECTING A PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS INDEX FOR THE PREDICTION OF MEDICAL OUTCOMES USING ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIMS DATA, Journal of clinical epidemiology, 48(7), 1995, pp. 917-926
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath","Medicine, General & Internal
ISSN journal
08954356
Volume
48
Issue
7
Year of publication
1995
Pages
917 - 926
Database
ISI
SICI code
0895-4356(1995)48:7<917:SAPCIF>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Recently, there has been a great deal of discussion regarding the use of administrative databases to study outcomes of medical care. A major issue in this discussion is how to classify patients in terms of char acteristics such as disease-severity, comorbidities, resource needs, s tability, etc. Different indices have been developed in an attempt to provide a common classification scheme in terms of these characteristi cs. In this paper, we examine the utility of four indices in the predi ction of length of stay and 30-day mortality for patients undergoing t otal knee replacement surgery between 1985 and 1989. The indices that we compare are the Deyo-adapted Charlson Index, the Relative Intensity Score derived from Patient Management Categories (PMCs), the Patient Severity Level derived from PMCs, and the number of diagnoses (up to f ive) listed in the Medicare claims data. The first three of these indi ces represent measures of comorbidity, resource use, and severity of i llness, respectively. The number of diagnoses is likely to capture asp ects of each of these characteristics. We find that all of the indices improve (in terms of model fit) over the baseline (no index) models o f length of stay and mortality, and the Relative Intensity Score and P atient Severity Level result in the greatest improvement in measures o f model fit. We found, however, that these two indices have a non-mono tonic relationship with length of stay and mortality. The Deyo-adapted Charlson Index performed least well of the four indices in terms of e xplanatory ability. The number of diagnoses performed well, and does n ot suffer from problems associated with miscoding on claims data.