Vb. Hinsz et Ke. Indahl, ASSIMILATION TO ANCHORS FOR DAMAGE AWARDS IN A MOCK CIVIL TRIAL, Journal of applied social psychology, 25(11), 1995, pp. 991-1026
Some judicial reforms propose that limits on damage awards in civil tr
ials will lower the amounts awarded while still maintaining perception
s of justice. This article describes research that examines the impact
of damage award limits on mock juror judgments. Existing theory sugge
sts that limits will serve as anchors for the mock jurors' judgments.
Predictions that damage awards would move toward the anchor introduced
by a limit were supported. This research suggests that depending on t
he location of the anchor on the response scale, limits may not have t
he intended effects. Instead, limits may actually increase damage awar
ds, and may also reduce juror's perceptions of fairness of the damage
award judgments.