UTILITY OF A SOFTWARE ASSISTANT IN CRITICAL CARE CASE REVIEW

Citation
L. Samuels et Jn. Gordon, UTILITY OF A SOFTWARE ASSISTANT IN CRITICAL CARE CASE REVIEW, The American journal of emergency medicine, 15(1), 1997, pp. 43-48
Citations number
2
Categorie Soggetti
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care
ISSN journal
07356757
Volume
15
Issue
1
Year of publication
1997
Pages
43 - 48
Database
ISI
SICI code
0735-6757(1997)15:1<43:UOASAI>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
A computer program (the Audit Assistant) was developed to help physici ans review the care of critically ill emergency department (ED) patien ts. The program is an example of a new class of decision aids that ser ves to remind physicians to consider possibilities, not an artificial intelligence program that actually attempts to simulate clinical reaso ning. The goal of such programs is to enable physicians to reduce erro rs--in this case to enable reviewers to notice more of the errors in c are in the cases they are reviewing. The objective of this study was t o demonstrate on a small set of complex cases that the tested computer program enables the physician to perform a better quality review. The issue of what constitutes improved case review is addressed. In the f irst part of the study, reviewers reviewed two mock charts without usi ng the Audit Assistant and then immediately reviewed the charts again with the assistance of the program. The reviews were compared. In the second part of the study, a second reviewer also compared the utility of the review of the first reviewer alone and the Audit Assistant outp ut as an aid to review, using an additional mock chart. Six emergency physicians participated; each was a quality assurance director for the ED of one Cleveland area hospital. For the physicians reviewing witho ut the Audit Assistant, 41% of critical actions were listed by three o r four reviewers. For those using the Audit Assistant, 83% of critical actions were listed by three or four reviewers. All reviewers preferr ed the Audit Assistant-suggested list to the critical action list gene rated by a previous reviewer not using the Audit Assistant (P < .02). Use of the Audit Assistant improved the completeness and the consisten cy of physician review of mock charts of critically ill ED patients in a small series of cases. The critical actions added for review were i mportant, as demonstrated by the preferential addition of critical act ions chosen by other reviewers who were not using the computer program . Copyright (C) 1997 by W.B. Saunders Company