B. Mathew et al., EVALUATION OF UTILIZATION OF HEALTH-WORKERS FOR SECONDARY PREVENTION OF ORAL-CANCER IN KERALA, INDIA, European journal of cancer. Part B, Oral oncology, 31B(3), 1995, pp. 193-196
The utilisation of primary health workers (HWs) for cancer control in
developing countries has often been suggested, based on the experience
of feasibility studies in India and Sri Lanka. We initiated a project
in 1988 to evaluate the long-term feasibility of using trained HWs in
secondary prevention of oral cancer, to bring about earlier detection
of oral cancer in the communities served by them. Two hundred and eig
hty-two HWs attached to 14 primary health centres (PHCs), serving appr
oximately 0.92 million rural population in the northern half of Trivan
drum district in Kerala, India, were trained in oral visual inspection
to detect precancerous, malignant and other suspicious lesions of the
oral cavity and refer them for confirmation and treatment. They were
asked to examine subjects aged 35 years and above and to give person t
o person health education on tobacco in their target population. The H
Ws belonging to the PHCs serving approximately 1 million rural populat
ion in the southern half of Trivandrum district were not trained, and
this region served as the control area. In addition to several process
measures, stage distribution of oral cancer in subjects reporting fro
m the intervention and control areas, as well as oral cancers referred
by the HWs, as a proportion of total oral cancers from the interventi
on area, were the outcome measures evaluated. Only 9/282 (3.2%) traine
d HWs were motivated and they examined 17812 eligible subjects in 3 ye
ars and referred 408 subjects with lesions; 258/408 (63.2%) referred s
ubjects reported for further examination and ten oral cancers were det
ected among them. There were no differences in the proportions of vari
ous clinical stages of the 302 oral cancer patients from the intervent
ion area and the 287 patients from the control area who reported for t
reatment between July 1989 and June 1992. Only ten (3.3%) of 302 oral
cancers in the intervention area had been referred by trained HWs. The
present study failed to motivate the HWs for oral cancer control. No
trend towards earlier detection of oral cancers was observed in the in
tervention area. Further research is needed to develop an appropriate
primary healthcare model for cancer control in developing countries.