Nm. Soede et al., EFFECTS OF TIME OF INSEMINATION RELATIVE TO OVULATION, AS DETERMINED BY ULTRASONOGRAPHY, ON FERTILIZATION RATE AND ACCESSORY SPERM COUNT INSOWS, Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 104(1), 1995, pp. 99-106
The effects of the timing of insemination relative to ovulation on fer
tilization rate, accessory sperm count and early embryo development we
re studied in sows. Oestrus detection was performed at intervals of 8
h. Sows were artificially inseminated once with 3 x 10(9) spermatozoa.
Transrectal ultrasonography was performed at intervals of 4 h to dete
rmine when ovulation occurred and sows were killed at 120 +/- 6 h afte
r ovulation. For each insemination-ovulation interval of 8 h, fertiliz
ation rates were as follows: > 48 h, 35% (n = 1); 48-40 h, 51 +/- 36%
(n = 6); 40-32 h, 54 +/- 36% (n = 14); 32-24 h, 79 +/- 32% (n = 19); 2
4-16 h, 94 +/- 11% (n = 24); 16-8 h, 92 +/- 21% (n = 24); 8-0 h, 95 +/
- 22% (n = 21) and for the sows that were inseminated after ovulation:
0 to - 8 h, 75 +/- 38% (n = 26); - 8 to - 16 h, 74 +/- 43% (n = 15) a
nd < - 16 h, 0% (n = 1). The median accessory sperm count differed amo
ng the groups from 1. (insemination 40-48 h 1 before ovulation) to 126
(insemination 0-8 h after ovulation) (P = 0.0001). Within each 8 h ti
me interval, the normal embryos from sows with less than 90% normal em
bryos were less developed and had a lower sperm count than did the nor
mal embryos from sows with more than 90% normal embryos (P < 0.05). In
conclusion, fertilization rate and the accessory sperm count of the n
ormal embryos were dependent on the interval between insemination and
ovulation; fertilization results were optimal when insemination took p
lace between 0 and 24 h before ovulation. Partial fertilization occurr
ed in all the insemination-ovulation time intervals, but the frequency
differed among the time intervals. In every insemination-ovulation ti
me interval of 8 h the between-sow variation of reproductive character
istics (fertilization rate, accessory sperm count, embryo development)
was large. The reasons for this variability between sows are unclear.