Among the most noted and studied societal tendencies of recent decades
have been those associated with structural change in industrial socie
ties becoming postindustrial. Within political science, much attention
has been focused on the behavioural and institutional effects of valu
e change accompanying that transition, and especially on the diminishi
ng impact of class and ideology on politics. Among the institutional e
ffects have been (at times and in some places) decline in support for
''established'' parties and the rise of alternative political organiza
tions, including new parties on both the left and right. Many of the n
ew parties of the left, and especially those labelled ''left-libertari
an'', are generally viewed as harbingers of things-to-come in the ''ne
w'' politics-progressive vehicles, driven along by the tides of change
. In contrast, the new parties of the right are generally viewed as co
nservative, authoritarian, materialist reactions to change - represent
ing transitional efforts to stop change and its effects. The latter pa
rties presumably tell more about the past, the present, and efforts to
preserve them, than about the ''new'' in politics. The purpose of thi
s article is to explore the possibility that some of the new right-win
g parties - especially those in social democracies - might themselves
be viewed more accurately (or at least as justifiably, based on reinte
rpretation of the available evidence) as reflections of new values and
as vehicles of forward-looking change. If so, then those parties, lik
e their left-libertarian counterparts, may tell us something about the
future of postindustrial politics.