Levels of risk assessment evoked by either a synthetic predator odor o
r noncontact exposure to live rats were examined under white or red li
ght conditions. Defensive responses to the predator odor were infreque
nt in white light and showed a modest, but reliable, increase under re
d light. Noncontact exposure to rats, in contrast, produced considerab
ly higher levels of risk assessment than did odors in white light, and
these levels were nearly doubled under red light. Judicious selection
of eliciting and background stimuli may provide considerable control
over the intensity of risk assessment. Such procedures may prove usefu
l for the study of anxiety-like states.