The aim of the study was to examine whether triclosan has an effect on
developing gingival inflammation. 10 volunteers, with clinically heal
thy gingivae were enrolled. The study was performed as a 2-week, doubl
e-blind, crossover, experimental gingivitis trial. Between each plaque
accumulation period, there was a wash-out phase of 4 weeks. A baselin
e examination was performed which included assessment of plaque and gi
ngivitis. The volunteers were asked to refrain from mechanical oral hy
giene measures for 2 weeks. During this period, they rinsed 2x daily w
ith one of the randomly assigned mouthrinse preparations. Solution A (
period A): 0.06% triclosan+ 2% tween 80. Solution B (period B): 0.06%
triclosan+ 0.25% sodium lauryl sulphate. Re-examinations were performe
d on days 4, 7, 11 and 14. The mean plaque score increased during peri
od A to 2.2 (day 4), 2.8 (day 7), 3.1 (day 11) and 3.1 (day 14). The c
orresponding scores for period B were significantly lower; 1.2 (day 4)
, 1.8 (day 7), 2.0 (day 11) and 2.2 (day 14). The mean gingivitis scor
es at baseline were 0.17 (periods A and B). The mean gingivitis scores
increased to 0.45 (day 4), 0.69 (day 7), 0.83 (day 11) and 0.96 (day
14) when the subjects rinsed with solution A and 0.42 (day 4), 0.64 (d
ay 7), 0.78 (day 11) and 0.92 (day 14) in period B. There were no stat
istically significant differences between periods A and B with respect
to gingivitis. Thus, although significantly more plaque formed during
period A than period B, no differences could be found between the gin
givitis scores in the 2 periods.