Political parties in Finland deviate from the Scandinavian standard, a
s they are highly controlled by laws and decrees. Regulation and contr
ol have a negative connotation in Scandinavia because they are seen as
associated with state interference, in opposition to the corner-stone
s of civic liberty. Organization theories support the negative concept
ions, as publicly controlled organizations are considered more central
ized and less open to membership influence. According to these theorie
s, this tendency is most prominent in large and/or important parties.
However, the present study shows that there is a wide variety among pa
rties in their degree of hierarchical and egalitarian rule. Party orga
nization is affected more by age of party and common ideology than by
party size and importance. The system promotes a given level of member
ship influence, as party democracy is compulsory.