Objective: Severe blunt testicular trauma is an infrequently reported
consequence of injury, yet it is associated with significant sequelae.
This case series evaluates the characteristics of patients with sever
e blunt testicular trauma, assesses the role of ultrasonography in the
ir management, and offers an evaluation algorithm for use by both emer
gency and urology personnel. Methods: A retrospective review was condu
cted of ten patients who had severe blunt testicular injuries referred
for urologic evaluation over a seven-year period at a level 1 trauma
center. Attention was focused on ultrasonographic results, operative f
indings, and testicular salvage rates. Results: With the exception of
two motorcycle crash victims, patients presented in a delayed fashion
(mean 3.5 days; range 1-5 days). Most (6/10) patients had true testicu
lar rupture, all were explored urgently, and there was a 100% testicul
ar salvage rate. Of the eight patients who had preoperative ultrasonog
raphic examination, two were reported to show testicular rupture, but
on exploration only one in fact had a tunica albuginea tear. Six patie
nts had ultrasonographic examinations that revealed nonspecific abnorm
alities but failed to show testicular rupture; three had testicular ru
pture. Conclusions: Ultrasonography cannot be relied on to accurately
diagnose rupture of the testis in high-risk patients. However, testicu
lar rupture is universally associated with an abnormal ultrasonography
scan, albeit commonly yielding nonspecific findings. A high level of
suspicion is mandatory with high-energy transfer mechanisms. Since a s
ignificant delay in presentation is not unusual, early exploration is
warranted in the setting of high risk and provides an excellent chance
of testicular salvage. Injuries associated with normal testicular ult
rasonography may be managed conservatively.