Background. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a
n asthma prevalence video questionnaire (involving the audiovisual pre
sentation of clinical asthma), a standard written questionnaire (based
on the IUATLD Bronchial Symptoms Questionnaire) and a new written que
stionnaire (designed for an international study of asthma and allergie
s in childhood [ISAAC]) in predicting bronchial hyper-responsiveness (
BHR) (PD20 less than or equal to 7.8 mu mol methacholine). Methods. Th
e IUATLD and video questionnaires were administered to 193 schoolchild
ren (13-16 years). The ISAAC questionnaire was administered to 87 of t
hese children. All children subsequently underwent bronchial challenge
to methacholine. Results. The sensitivity and specificity for predict
ing BHR were similar for individual questions from the IUATLD and vide
o questionnaires, The Video questions with the highest Youden's index
related to moderate wheezing at rest (0.46), severe wheezing at rest (
0.38), and nocturnal wheezing (0.37). The ISAAC questionnaire was simi
lar in effectiveness to the IUATLD questionnaire in predicting BHR. Co
nclusions. The video questionnaire is a valid method of assessing the
prevalence of BHR, and may be particularly useful when comparing popul
ations with differing languages and cultures. Some video questions app
eared more effective than others in relation to predicting BHR. A new
written questionnaire (ISAAC) designed for a large international asthm
a prevalence study in children also is an effective method for measuri
ng the prevalence of BHR.