Overgrowth relationships in the fossil record of encrusting organisms
on marine hard substrata have been used to infer success in competitiv
e interactions, particularly for modular organisms such as colonial in
vertebrates and coralline algae. However, this interpretation has been
questioned to varying extent-even by those who have used the procedur
e-because of the possibility that any individual observation may repre
sent growth over a senescent organism or dead skeletal remains. Where
sufficient numbers of overgrowth relationships are available to demons
trate that the proportions of overgrowths between two modular taxa are
not essentially equal, the competitive superiority of the more freque
ntly overgrowing taxon should be accepted. The degree of success of th
e more frequently overgrowing taxon was at least as great as seen in t
he fossil record and was probably substantially greater, depending upo
n the percent of bare surface on the substratum.