Although the currently dominant concept of humanitarian intervention h
as a long history, it is also distinctive in several crucial respects.
This article analyzes its nature, historical specificity and presuppo
sitions. It argues that the concept of humanitarian intervention is lo
gically unstable in the sense that it both presupposes and seeks to go
beyond the statist manner of thinking which has dominated political l
ife for the past three centuries. The article exposes the incoherence
of the statist paradigm and concludes by arguing that, although humani
tarian intervention is justified under certain circumstances, it is to
o limited, too late and too superficial to be of lasting value, and ne
eds to be embedded in and undertaken as part of a larger project of cr
eating a just and nonstatist global order.