INCREASING BINDING CONSTANTS OF LIGANDS TO CARBONIC-ANHYDRASE BY USING GREASY TAILS

Citation
Jm. Gao et al., INCREASING BINDING CONSTANTS OF LIGANDS TO CARBONIC-ANHYDRASE BY USING GREASY TAILS, Journal of medicinal chemistry, 38(13), 1995, pp. 2292-2301
Citations number
72
Categorie Soggetti
Chemistry Medicinal
ISSN journal
00222623
Volume
38
Issue
13
Year of publication
1995
Pages
2292 - 2301
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-2623(1995)38:13<2292:IBCOLT>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Two series of para-substituted benzenesulfonamides have been examined as inhibitors for bovine carbonic anhydrase II (CAII, EC 4.2.1.1). Bot h series have hydrophobic alkyl group R connected by amide linkages to the aromatic ring (H2NO2SC6H4-CH(2)NHCOR(1) and H2NO2SC6H4-CONR(2)R(3 )). The free energy of partitioning (Delta Gp) Of these ligands betwee n water and octanol had similar, linear correlations with the molecula r surface areas of the hydrophobic groups R; Delta Gp was only relativ ely weakly influenced by the Linkage to the benzenesulfonamide and the detailed structure of the group R. Binding of these ligands to CAII w as more complicated. For compounds having the structure H2NO2SC6H4-L-R , the dependence of the free energy of binding to CAII on the surface area of the hydrocarbon (fluorocarbon) group R for different -L-R was (d Delta G(b)/dA, kcal/(mol . 100 Angstrom(2))): -CH(2)NHCOR(H), -0.71 +/- 0.03; -CH(2)NHCOR(F), -0.72 +/- 0.07; -CONHCH(2)R(H), -2.5 +/- 0. 1; and -CONHCH(2)R(F), -2.7 +/- 0.3. The available data permit several conclusions: (i) details (linear, branched, cyclic) of the structure of the group R(H) are relatively unimportant in determining binding co nstants (although cyclic structures may bind slightly more strongly th an acyclic ligands with the same carbon number); (ii) for a given clas s of compounds, binding constants of hydrocarbons and fluorocarbons ha ving the same surface area are very similar; and (iii) the nature of t he linker L influences the sensitivity of binding to the surface area of the group R, presumably by its influences in positioning the group in the binding pocket of the enzyme. Fluorocarbons seem to be more hyd rophobic than hydrocarbons of the same carbon number because they have larger areas of hydrophobic surface; the hydrophobicity of hydrocarbo n and fluorocarbon surfaces are similar, after correction for differen ces in area.