Er. Barbero et al., ROLE OF AMIDATION IN BILE-ACID EFFECT ON DNA-SYNTHESIS BY REGENERATING MOUSE-LIVER, American journal of physiology: Gastrointestinal and liver physiology, 31(6), 1995, pp. 1051-1059
Effect of bile acids on DNA synthesis by the regenerating liver was in
vestigated in mice in vivo after partial hepatectomy (Ph). Radioactivi
ty incorporation into DNA after [C-14]thymidine intraperitoneal admini
stration peaked at 48 h after PH. At this time a significant taurochol
ate-induced dose-dependent reduction in DNA synthesis without changes
in total liver radioactivity content was found (half-maximal effect at
similar to 0.1 mu mol/g body wt). Effect of taurocholate (0.5 mu mol/
g body wt) was mimicked by cholate, ursodeoxycholate, deoxycholate, de
hydrocholate, tauroursodeoxycholate, taurochenodeoxycholate, and tauro
deoxycholate. In contrast, chenodeoxycholate, glycocholate, glycocheno
deoxycholate, glycoursodeoxycholate, glycodeoxycholate, 5 beta-cholest
ane, bromosulfophthalein, and free taurine lacked this effect. No rela
tionship between hydrophobic-hydrophilic balance and inhibitory effect
was observed. Analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography indi
cated that inhibition of thymidine incorporation into DNA was not acco
mpanied by an accumulation of phosphorylated DNA precursors in the liv
er but rather by a parallel increase in nucleotide catabolism. Bile ac
id-induced modifications in DNA synthesis were observed in vivo even i
n the absence of changes in toxicity tests, which suggests that the in
hibitory effect shared by most unconjugated and tauro-conjugated bile
acids but not by glycoconjugated bile acids should be accounted for by
mechanisms other than nonselective liver cell injury.